How the Trump Administration and DOGE Are Reshaping Government Contracting and Procurement
The landscape of government contracting is undergoing significant change under the Trump administration. With the establishment of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk, federal procurement processes are being overhauled to eliminate what the administration deems wasteful spending and inefficiencies.
These changes have sent ripples across industries reliant on government contracts, grants, and financial assistance. From stricter compliance requirements to the suspension of federal payments, contractors and business owners must now navigate an unpredictable and evolving landscape. This article explores the recent shifts, their impact on procurement, and what businesses can do to stay ahead.
The Role of DOGE and Its Impact on Government Procurement
What is DOGE?
The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is a newly established agency under the Trump administration tasked with streamlining government spending, eliminating inefficiencies, and overhauling the federal procurement process. Under the leadership of Elon Musk, DOGE has been given unprecedented access to the U.S. Treasury’s payment systems, allowing it to review and, in some cases, suspend payments to contractors, grantees, and other entities receiving federal funds.
The administration has framed DOGE as a necessary tool to ensure taxpayer dollars are spent wisely, particularly in an era where federal budgets are under increased scrutiny. Critics, however, have raised concerns about the lack of transparency in how DOGE determines which contracts and payments are deemed unnecessary, arguing that the agency has too much unchecked power over the financial disbursement process.
Key Actions Taken by DOGE
1. Review and Suspension of Payments
DOGE has implemented an aggressive review process to scrutinize all federal contracts and financial assistance programs. The agency has focused on:
Identifying contracts that may not provide direct value to government operations.
Pausing payments on projects deemed redundant or outdated.
Reviewing multi-year contracts for possible early termination if cost savings can be achieved.
As a result, numerous federal contractors, including those in industries such as infrastructure, defense, and consulting, have reported unexpected payment delays and contract suspensions. For small businesses relying on government contracts for cash flow, these pauses have led to financial strain and uncertainty about future work.
One of DOGE’s most controversial moves was halting payments to certain federal grantees, including programs related to foreign aid and non-defense research initiatives. The agency has claimed that these programs are under review to ensure alignment with the administration’s broader policy priorities, but the abrupt nature of these decisions has left many contractors and grant recipients struggling to plan for the future.
2. Procurement Reforms and Contractor Concerns
One of the primary objectives of DOGE is to eliminate bureaucratic red tape that has historically slowed the federal acquisition process. Several large defense contractors, including General Atomics and L3Harris Technologies, have actively engaged with DOGE to advocate for reforms that would allow faster procurement cycles, particularly for military hardware and national security projects.
Key proposed changes include:
Reducing the layers of approval required for contract awards.
Shifting from traditional bid processes to outcome-based evaluations.
Consolidating federal contracting regulations to remove redundancies.
While these changes could speed up procurement for certain industries, they also raise concerns about transparency and fairness in contract awards. Smaller businesses that rely on competitive bidding processes fear they may be pushed out in favor of larger firms that can more easily adapt to new procurement models.
Additionally, the administration’s move to streamline procurement has led to questions about whether essential oversight mechanisms are being weakened. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) and various watchdog groups have voiced concerns that reducing regulatory safeguards could open the door to increased waste, fraud, and abuse.
3. Removal of DEI Requirements in Government Contracts
Another major policy shift driven by DOGE and executive orders from the administration is the removal of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) mandates from federal contracts.
Historically, government contractors were required to implement affirmative action programs under Executive Order 11246, which mandated equal employment opportunity provisions for federal contractors. The Trump administration has rolled back these provisions, emphasizing a merit-based hiring approach instead.
Key changes include:
Eliminating requirements for contractors to submit DEI compliance reports.
Prohibiting race- or gender-based hiring preferences in federally funded projects.
Scrutinizing existing contracts that contain DEI initiatives for potential termination.
While proponents argue that this approach ensures hiring decisions are based solely on merit and qualifications, critics contend that it may undermine efforts to create diverse and inclusive work environments, particularly for historically underrepresented groups in federal contracting.
Several large contractors have already signaled that they are re-evaluating internal diversity initiatives to ensure compliance with the new policies. Companies that previously benefited from set-aside contracts for minority-owned businesses or other preference-based programs may also see significant reductions in contracting opportunities.
Policy Changes Affecting Federal Contractors
The impact of these policy shifts extends beyond DOGE’s actions. Several new executive orders and federal agency directives are fundamentally altering the landscape of government procurement and financial assistance.
Executive Orders Reshaping Contracting Compliance
One of the most significant executive orders affecting federal contractors was signed in early 2025 and mandates that all government contractors certify their compliance with federal anti-discrimination laws while confirming that they do not operate DEI programs that provide what the administration considers “unlawful preferences.”
This order:
Eliminates previous DEI reporting requirements that contractors had to submit under prior regulations.
Requires federal contractors to certify compliance with new merit-based hiring mandates.
Removes race, gender, and other identity-based preferences in federal hiring and contracting decisions.
Failure to meet these new certification standards could result in contract cancellations or penalties under the False Claims Act. Businesses that previously included DEI initiatives in their government contracts must now conduct internal audits to ensure their practices align with the revised federal guidelines.
Suspension of Federal Grants, Loans, and Financial Assistance
In addition to contract changes, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has issued a directive pausing all federal financial assistance programs, including grants, loans, and cooperative agreements. This move has affected businesses, universities, and nonprofit organizations that rely on federal funding.
Impacted programs include:
Research grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Science Foundation (NSF).
Federal disaster relief funds and housing grants.
Foreign aid programs administered by the State Department.
While the administration argues that this pause is necessary to review spending priorities, critics warn that it creates uncertainty for recipients who depend on these funds to sustain operations.
Issuance of Stop-Work Orders and Contract Terminations
Several federal agencies, including the General Services Administration (GSA) and the Department of Defense (DoD), have issued stop-work orders on active contracts. The GSA’s procurement suspension has been particularly disruptive, affecting:
New task and delivery orders.
Contract modifications and renewals.
Pending awards that were expected to be issued in fiscal year 2025.
The DoD’s reassessment of active contracts has also raised concerns among defense contractors who rely on steady procurement cycles. While some firms anticipate that streamlining acquisition processes could lead to more opportunities in the long run, others worry that projects deemed non-essential could face abrupt cancellations.
In Summary: Navigating the Shifting Landscape of Government Contracting
The Trump administration’s policies—through DOGE, executive orders, and funding suspensions—have created a rapidly evolving and uncertain landscape for government contractors. The removal of DEI mandates, procurement reforms, and increased scrutiny over federal payments signal a shift toward cost-cutting measures that could benefit some industries while disadvantaging others.
For businesses that rely on federal contracts, the key to success in this new environment is proactive adaptation:
Monitor policy updates from OMB, GSA, and federal agencies.
Review and update compliance policies to ensure alignment with new federal mandates.
Diversify revenue streams to reduce dependency on federal contracts.
By staying informed and adapting strategies accordingly, businesses can navigate these challenges while positioning themselves for future government contracting opportunities.
If you aren't a Squared Compass partner, what are you waiting for? From getting your business set up with specific government set aside programs at both the State and Federal level, to being empowered by a Fractional Capture team to win government contracts, to receiving tailored government contract opportunities Squared Compass delivers immense value which helps propel our partners to success. Schedule a chat with our team today.
