USAID vs. Private Foundations: Which Drives More Impact Per Dollar?
Introduction
Billions of dollars are poured into global development and philanthropic causes each year, but where does this money go, and how efficiently is it used? Is bigger always better, or do leaner operations make a greater impact? In this article, we compare the funding efficiency of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) with three powerhouse private foundations: the Michael & Susan Dell Foundation, the Knight Foundation, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The results may surprise you.
Follow the Money: Funding Distribution
In 2023, USAID dominated in total funding, distributing a staggering $16.2 billion—far more than any of the three foundations. The Gates Foundation came next with an impressive $6.23 billion, while the Dell and Knight Foundations distributed $116 million and $120 million, respectively.
But here’s where things get interesting: raw dollars don’t always translate to efficiency. When we look at funding distributed per employee, a different picture emerges. The Gates Foundation leads the pack, distributing $3.08 million per employee. USAID, despite its massive budget, only manages $1.62 million per employee—a stark contrast that raises questions about bureaucracy and operational efficiency. Meanwhile, the Knight Foundation and Dell Foundation distribute $1.07 million and $930,341 per employee, respectively.
Measuring Impact: Grants and Organizations Served
Money alone doesn’t tell the whole story—where it goes and how it's divided matters just as much. Let’s break it down:
USAID awarded 3,131 grants to 620 organizations
Gates Foundation awarded 2,713 grants to 1,602 organizations
Dell Foundation awarded 737 grants to 608 organizations
Knight Foundation awarded 377 grants to 282 organizations
USAID awarded the highest number of grants overall, but when we compare efficiency per employee, private foundations outperform it dramatically. The Dell Foundation awarded 5.89 grants per employee, compared to 0.31 per employee at USAID. The Knight Foundation and Gates Foundation also demonstrated significantly higher efficiency, awarding 3.37 and 1.34 grants per employee, respectively. Likewise, USAID supported only 0.06 organizations per employee, a fraction of the efficiency demonstrated by its private counterparts.
The Efficiency Factor: Who Does More with Less?
The results suggest a clear divide: while USAID’s vast budget allows it to fund more initiatives, its large workforce and bureaucratic structure reduce efficiency. In contrast, private foundations such as the Dell Foundation and Knight Foundation operate leaner teams, enabling them to distribute more grants and support more organizations per employee. The Gates Foundation, with its massive funding pool and relatively lean workforce, leads in financial efficiency per employee.
The Takeaway
More money doesn’t always mean more impact. USAID’s size gives it reach and influence, but private foundations demonstrate how a leaner structure can achieve greater efficiency. If maximizing impact per dollar is the goal, private foundations may have a clear advantage. As governments and philanthropists seek to improve funding effectiveness, understanding these dynamics is crucial in shaping the future of global development and philanthropy.
UPDATE: We’ve received a lot of questions, some agreement, and some push back from this article. Rather than replying to each individual message and question, we thought that we would write one response: USAID vs Gates Foundation: A Fair Comparison?
If you aren't a Squared Compass partner, what are you waiting for? From getting your business set up with specific government set aside programs at both the State and Federal level, to being empowered by a Fractional Capture team to win government contracts, to receiving tailored government contract opportunities Squared Compass delivers immense value which helps propel our partners to success. Schedule a chat with our team today.
Sources:
foundationcenter.org
usaspending.gov
zoominfo.com
crsreports.congress.gov
