Mastering the Government Contract Evaluation Process
The evaluation process in government contracting is a critical stage where the contracting agency assesses and ranks proposals based on established criteria. This procedure often determines the award of the contract. It's crucial to understand this process thoroughly, whether you're a novice or a seasoned contractor in the industry.
Evaluation Factors and Significant Subfactors
Before embarking on a proposal, carefully review the solicitation's Section M, where the government agency details the evaluation factors and significant subfactors. These are essentially the agency's selection criteria, including cost/price, past performance, technical approach, management plan, and other factors specific to the project. Each factor will carry a certain weight or importance. Remember, the cost or price is always an evaluation factor in contract award decisions, but it may not necessarily be the most heavily weighted factor.
Proposal Evaluation Techniques
Different procurements utilize different evaluation techniques, usually categorized as lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA), tradeoff, or best value continuum.
In LPTA evaluations, the agency awards the contract to the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest price.
The tradeoff process allows the government to consider awarding to other than the lowest priced proposal or other than the highest technically rated proposal.
The best value continuum is a balance between LPTA and tradeoff processes where the government considers both price and non-price factors.
Understanding the evaluation technique used is crucial as it can significantly influence your proposal strategy.
Ratings Systems
Ratings systems are often used to score non-cost factors, and each agency might use different rating scales. Common ones include color/adjectival ratings, numerical scores, or risk assessments. Understanding these systems can help guide your proposal's content and emphasis.
Evaluation Teams
Proposals are typically evaluated by a team of technical experts, contract specialists, and the project's end-users. This team reviews each proposal against the evaluation criteria and prepares a report summarizing their findings for the Source Selection Authority (SSA).
Source Selection Decision
The Source Selection Authority (SSA) makes the final contract award decision based on the evaluation team's findings. The SSA may conduct a tradeoff analysis if the solicitation allows it, comparing the strengths, weaknesses, risks, and costs of each proposal.
Debriefings
After the contract award, unsuccessful offerors can request a debriefing. This is an opportunity to understand the weaknesses in your proposal and to gain insights for future bids. Debriefings can be requested both after exclusion from the competitive range and after contract award.
Protests
An unsuccessful offeror who disagrees with the agency's award decision may file a protest. Protests can be filed with the contracting agency (Agency-Level protest), the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), or the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (COFC). It's crucial to know that each avenue has different deadlines and procedures. The most common is the GAO protest, which generally must be filed no later than 10 days after the basis of protest is known, or should have been known, or within 5 days after a requested and promised debriefing.
Understanding and successfully navigating the evaluation process can significantly enhance your chances of securing a government contract. Even for experienced contractors, each proposal represents a new opportunity to refine your understanding of this complex but crucial process.
Get government opportunities tailored to your business sent to you by signing up here.
